Cited by 1,679Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsMarine Plankton and BiogeochemistrySoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 184 of the 184 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DENITRIFICATION ACROSS LANDSCAPES AND WATERSCAPES: A SYNTHESIS

Open access
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J. K., Bouwman, A. F., Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C., Drecht, G. Van·2006·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Denitrification is a critical process regulating the removal of bioavailable nitrogen (N) from natural and human-altered systems. While it has been extensively studied in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems, there has been limited communication among denitrification scientists working in these individual systems. Here, we compare rates of denitrification and controlling factors across a range of ecosystem types. We suggest that terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems in which denitrification occurs can be organized along a continuum ranging from (1) those in which nitrification and denitrification are tightly coupled in space and time to (2) those in which nitrate production and denitrification are relatively decoupled. In aquatic ecosystems, N inputs influence denitrification rates whereas hydrology and geomorphology influence the proportion of N inputs that are denitrified. Relationships between denitrification and water residence time and N load are remarkably similar across lakes, river reaches, estuaries, and continental shelves. Spatially distributed global models of denitrification suggest that continental shelf sediments account for the largest portion (44%) of total global denitrification, followed by terrestrial soils (22%) and oceanic oxygen minimum zones (OMZs; 14%). Freshwater systems (groundwater, lakes, rivers) account for about 20% and estuaries 1% of total global denitrification. Denitrification of land-based N sources is distributed somewhat differently. Within watersheds, the amount of land-based N denitrified is generally highest in terrestrial soils, with progressively smaller amounts denitrified in groundwater, rivers, lakes and reservoirs, and estuaries. A number of regional exceptions to this general trend of decreasing denitrification in a downstream direction exist, including significant denitrification in continental shelves of N from terrestrial sources. Though terrestrial soils and groundwater are responsible for much denitrification at the watershed scale, per-area denitrification rates in soils and groundwater (kg N x km(-2) x yr(-1)) are, on average, approximately one-tenth the per-area rates of denitrification in lakes, rivers, estuaries, continental shelves, or OMZs. A number of potential approaches to increase denitrification on the landscape, and thus decrease N export to sensitive coastal systems exist. However, these have not generally been widely tested for their effectiveness at scales required to significantly reduce N export at the whole watershed scale.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[2064:dalawa]2.0.co;2

Cites

184 of 184 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 181 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. L. A. Codispoti, and T. T. Packard .1980 .Denitrification rates in the eastern tropical South Pacific .Journal of Marine Research, 138 :453 -477 .
  2. B. L. Howes, P. K. Weiskel, D. D. Goehringer, and J. M. Teal .1996 .Interception of freshwater and nitrogen transported from upland to coastal waters: the role of salt marshes .Pages287 -310 in K. F. Norstrom and C. T. Roman, editorsEstuarine shores: evolution, environments and human alterations Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
  3. J. F. Kragt, W. deVries, and A. Breeuwsma .1990 .Modelling nitrate leaching on a regional scale .Pages340 -347 in R. H. Merckx, H. Vereecken, and K. Vlassak, editorsFertilization and the environment Leuven University Press, Leuven, Belgium.
  4. M. Mailloux, B. Tartakovsky, D. Milette, S. R. Guiot, A. Peisajovich, L. Olivier, C. Belanger, and M. Lorrain .2002 .Evaluation of a carbon-source stimulated bioremediation technology for the remediation of a nitrate-contaminated aquifer at an airport site .Pages919 -925 in D. Stolle, A. R. Piggott, and J. J. Crowder, editorsGround and water: theory to practice. Proceedings of the 55th Canadian Geotechnical and 3rd Joint IAH-CNC Groundwater Specialty Conferences Southern Ontario Section of the Canadian Geotechnical Society, Alliston, Ontario, Canada.
  5. S. W. Nixon, A. Oviatt, and S. S. Hale .1976 .Nitrogen regeneration and the metabolism of coastal marine bottom communities .Pages269 -283 in J. M. Anderson and A. Macfadyen, editorsThe role of terrestrial and aquatic organisms in decomposition processes Academic Press, New York, New York, USA.
  6. S. P. Seitzinger, 2000 .Scaling up: site specific measurements to global scale estimates of denitrification .Pages211 -240 in J. E. Hobbie, editorEstuarine science: a synthetic approach to research and practice Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
  7. L. A. Zucker, and L. C. Brown .1998 .Agricultural drainage: water quality impacts and subsurface drainage studies in the Midwest. Bulletin 871 Ohio State University Extension, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,679

Metadata

Authors
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J. K., Bouwman, A. F., Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C., & Drecht, G. V.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
  • Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory (US)
  • Marine Biological Laboratory (US)
  • University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
Corresponding author
Seitzinger, S.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
2064-2090
ISSN
1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148492494
Cited by
1,679
References
181
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 102 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 82
FWCI
26.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Access Server of the Woods Hole Scientific Community (Woods Hole Scientific Community) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine Plankton and Biogeochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
denitrification, nitrogen removal, terrestrial soil, groundwater, lakes, rivers, estuaries, continental shelf sediments, oxygen minimum zone, nitrification, water residence time, nitrogen export
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Fertilizers, Fresh Water, Nitrates, Nitrogen, Nitrogen Fixation, Oxygen, Seawater, Soil, Geologic Sediments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DENITRIFICATION ACROSS LANDSCAPES AND WATERSCAPES: A SYNTHESIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016%5B2064:dalawa%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Seitzinger, S., Harrison, J. A., Böhlke, J. K., Bouwman, A. F., Lowrance, R., Peterson, B., Tobias, C., & Drecht, G. V. (2006). DENITRIFICATION ACROSS LANDSCAPES AND WATERSCAPES: A SYNTHESIS. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016%5B2064%3Adalawa%5D2.0.co%3B2